Eclipse and IBM

It sure sounds like IBM Lotus plans to keep up with the Eclipse releases for the Expeditor and hence the Notes 8 platform. This is great. At least that is what John Head quotes Ed Brill as saying the the Collaboration University keynote. This is at least what I take from “Mac Beta in 8.0.1 … Eclipse 3.4 required and not ready yet”

Published by

lekkim

Positive, competent, out-spoken, frank and customer focused architect and developer with a strong foundation in web, cloud and product development. I'm a strong advocate for API first and cloud based solutions and development. I have a knack for being able to communicate and present technically complicated matters in conference, customer and training settings. I've previously acted as team member and leader in a product organisation.

2 thoughts on “Eclipse and IBM”

  1. Well, it’s good and bad.  It says a lot about the Java implementation on OSX that Eclipse makes an inadequate shell for Notes 8 without two more point releases.

    But that’s more Apple’s fault than IBM’s, IMO.

    I spent a significant amount of my weekend deconstructing the Expeditor environment for Notes 8 and learning how all this Eclipse business actually works.  New versions are going to be… exciting.  ๐Ÿ™‚

  2. About the Java implementation on OSX I think that’s pretty much agree upon in the field but I guess it’s going to take some time before Notes 8 on OSX (and on Linux for that matter) is production ready and all the problems, mainly installation wise, has been removed.

    As to deconstructing the Expeditor platform I agree that there are a lot of gems to be found once you start looking at the plugins… ๐Ÿ™‚

Comments are closed.