<< FeedDemon 2.7 available and it's still free | Home | SWT@Notes 8: Logging from SWT components >>

Anyone running mod_jk with Domino 7?

A while back I used the mod_jk DSAPI filter to use Domino as a web server for a Tomcat behind it and it worked fine. Anyone using that setup on Domino 7 today?

If you are do you have a binary version? If you do please let me have it! :-)

Tags : , , ,
Responses[4] RSS feed for responses to this blog entry
Posted by Mikkel Flindt Heisterberg on 19 May 2008 13:41:27 CEST #


Reply

Re: Anyone running mod_jk with Domino 7?

Comment from Finn Knudsen on 20 May 2008 06:07:57 CEST #
I think you can find it on
http://apache.mirrors.webname.dk/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/
Avatar: Mikkel Heisterberg
Reply

Re: Anyone running mod_jk with Domino 7?

Comment from Mikkel Heisterberg on 20 May 2008 07:11:31 CEST #
No unfortunately that's only the isapi (Microsoft IIS) and nsapi (??) filters. You have to compile the Domino version yourself unless I can find an older version / binary version... :-)
Avatar: Stipe Sumic
Reply

Re: Anyone running mod_jk with Domino 7?

Comment from Stipe Sumic on 28 May 2008 14:33:34 CEST #

Hello,

I hope it's not too late for this response.

I used this http://free.tagish.net/domino-tomcat/index.jsp Domino-Tomcat Redirector on my recent project. It works flawlessly on Domino 7 + Tomcat 5.5.

I hope you will find this information helpful, because I found your blog to be a unique and invaluable source of information, especially regarding Domino + Java (JVM instances, classloading, external libraries...).

P.S. Did you ever experience that JavaUserClassesEx Notes.ini variable masks (hides) the classpath set in JavaUserClasses variable?

Avatar: Mikkel Heisterberg
Reply

Re: Anyone running mod_jk with Domino 7?

Comment from Mikkel Heisterberg on 28 May 2008 14:39:50 CEST #
Any chance you could send me the binary version of the filter as I'm unable to locate it on the web. I can find the source but not the binary DSAPI filter. Please send it to mh [at] intravision.dk if possible.

As to the JavaUserClassesExt then yes - I believe it is either/or.

Add a comment Send a TrackBack